The Voice of Global Tamils






India had spent crores of public money to safeguard our borders; thousands of our brave men have given their lives to secure our borders. The War with our neighbour is not a footnote in history, but a chapter of sacrifice made by our army men. The cat on the wall Maharaja Harisingh’s clan till today enjoys patronage from the ruling establishment as reward for bartering their loyalty to India. The Indian Army only needed a nod from Indian Prime Minister at a crucial period of Indian history to drive Pakisthan out of Kashmir. The Indian Home Minister Sardar Vallabai Patel was urging Indian Prime Minister to give green signal to our Army Chief Major General Kariappa to secure Hyderabad and Kashmir at one go. While Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru consented for army intervention in Hyderabad, which fell for Indian arm in a day, hesitated to give his consent with regard to Kashmir. This indecision resulted in ever bleeding never-ending Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan. It is not treason to look back at history.


Similarly it is not a sin to pin point the blunders committed by our bureaucrats. Only politicians are portrayed as villains but bureaucrats enjoy immunity. This is bad practice. While workforce of the country, the real masters in a democracy are subjected a hire and fire policy, why not hire and fire policy be framed for bureaucrats and only such a whip will make them deliver goods without delay to the people.


We reproduce a letter addressed to then Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee on 5.1.2004. His government did not act nor I hope any government by bureaucrats and for bureaucrats will punish the guilty. But people of the country, the supreme power in a democracy have the right to know where and how it went wrong.



Hon’ble Prime Minister of India

Thiru.Atal Bihari Vajpayee


Respected Atalji


Subject: A white paper sought on the Kashmir issue to evolve national consensus and fix responsibility for faulty maps


All Indians will echo your feelings with regards to the Pakistan’s bartering away of Kashmiri territory to China, our neighbour. At the moment out of the total area of 222.336 square kilometers of Kashmiri state the possession is as follows:

Area of Jammu and Kashmir in possession of India:                       101,387 square kilometers.

Illegally occupied by Pakistan:                                                           78,114 square kilometers

Illegally handed over to China by Pakistan:                                      42,735 square kilometers

Illegal occupation of China and Pakistan:                            120,849 square kilometers

All this is shown as total area of Jammu and Kashmir 222,336 square kilometers. This figure is shown from 1988/89 to 1999 in all manuals brought out by the Ministry of information and Broadcasting.


So while with spirit of nationalism and patriotism we are ready to share your feeling of hurt for Pakistan’s handing over an area of 42,735 square kilometers to China. But let me request your office to trace out my letter-dated 24.8.1999 in which I had complained first about the following grave mistake.


I humbly submit that from the Source of INDIA: A REFERENCE MANUAL 1953 brought out by the Publications Division of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting in page 1…. “THE AREA OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATE WAS GIVEN AS 92,780 square miles which is equivalent to 240,300.20 square kilometers. How could this become 222.336 square kilometers in 1988?


Pakistan holds 78,114 square kilometers. China owns 42,735 square kilometers. India owns 101,387 square kilometers. By mistakes committed by our bureaucracy in preparing faulty maps, we have lost 18,036.20 square kilometers. Are we to take it for granted that 18.036.20 square kilometers vanished into thin air? Like Bermuda’s triangle in our earth’s oceans do we have a Bermuda’s triangle in our Ministries, which had swallowed 18,036.20 square kilometers? Who is responsible for this? Who is going to be held accountable for this? Are we going to find scapegoats? Or whether The National Democratic Alliance Government has the moral guts to fix the responsibility on the Congress governments that caused this national loss to our country?


While 1953 Manual says 92,780 square miles equivalent to 240.300.20 square kilometers, in 1960 Edition the area becomes 86,024 square miles equivalent to 222.802.16 square kilometers. Official reference journal published by a Ministry of the Government of India in 1960 at page 24-25, a district wise break up of the area of Jammu And Kashmir State is given. The total of this area arrives at a figure of 84,476 square miles, which is equivalent to 218,792.84 square kilometers.


In 1964 Edition page 7 has a different story to tell. It contains two different figures. In the column area figure a) shows 86,023 square miles equivalent to 222.799.57 square kilometers. Figure (b) shows 56665 square miles, which is under Indian possession. This amounts to 146,762.25 square kilometers? In 1965 Edition page 7 changes over to 222.896.78 square kilometers? In 1966 Edition page 7 Area of Jammu and Kashmir once again changed to 222,800 square kilometers? In 1968 Edition page 8 area of Jammu and Kashmir once again changed to 222,870 square kilometers .In 1988-89 edition the area of Jammu and Kashmir was shown as 222.236 square kilometers. In the very same edition in a different page693, the area of Jammu and Kashmir was shown as 222.236 square kilometers and a note inserted which stated “That this area includes 78,114 square kilometers under illegal occupation of Pakistan, 5280 square kilometers illegally handed over by Pakistan to China and 37,555 square kilometers illegally occupied by China “


 N.Nandhivarman General Secretary






Hon’ble Prime Minister of India Thiru.Manmohan Singh                            3.4.2008

And all his Caninet Minister


Copy to: Hon’ble Leader of Opposition in Loksabha Thiru.L.K.Advani and Hon’ble Leader of Opposition in RajyasabhaThiru.Jaswant singh


Respected Leaders


Subject: A citizen’s fight for 12 years against an M.L.A who is currently Chief Minister in a land grab case where Court judgments and eviction orders floated using stay orders obtained in dead person’s name, and the unlawful activities patronized by N.Rangasamy, the godfather of crime syndicate posing as paragon of virtue by media manipulation, needs for intervention by people with conscience regarding


The former Vice President of India B.D.Jatti, while he was the Lt.Governor can be approached even in midnight and mere mention that a citizen had come will wake him to receive the citizen and hear his grievance. He is my friend; hence I recall the value he attributed to the word citizen. In democracy a citizen is supreme, and I hope, you will rise above petty party considerations and end the anarchy and reign of terror unleashed by N.Rangasamy in power. This single real life story of the solitary fighter against the onslaughts of the Chief Minister who abuses power must awaken your conscience.


The scene begins in the II nd Additional District Magistrate’s court on 6th August 1998, where in Case No.O.S 38/97 then M.L.A of Thattanchavady N.Rangasamy stood in the witness box to tell untruth to the Court. He was the witness to support the property grabber, who is Defense witness 1 and N.Rangasamy Defense witness 2.


The learned judge in his order states: “The deposition of the DW 1 is as vague as vagueness could be. The contention of the defendant is that he has been occupying the suit property i.e. “B” schedule property for about 13 years. There is no iota or shred of evidence in support of the case of the defendant. DW 2. Rangasamy, then M.L.A of Thattanchavady would depose as though the defendant was occupying the suit property ever since 1984 and that it was he who got water connection for the defendants hut. If that be so at least there should be documentary evidence in that connection. During cross examination, DW 1 could not state how many huts are in that R.S.number, and that he did not know the specific land number of the property in which the defendant is residing. He could also detail and describe whether the defendant was exercising his right of ownership over the suit property openly, continuously and exclusively. The mere oral evidence of DW 2 without any reference to authentic records cannot be taken as sufficient evidence to prove the possession of the defendant for over 13 years as owner.  During the year 1982-83 as revealed by Ex x5 the land acquisition proceedings took place and in those proceedings nothing is shown that in R.S. No.77/1B any hut dwellers were occupying.” The learned judge in his judgment proved Rangasamy is a liar, and that was when he was mere M.L.A. The learned judge was transferred within one week as act of vendetta by Rangasamy, one could presume and it cannot be by coincidence. The irony of the story is that Rangasamy started planting voters in his constituency by encouraging grabbing of private property over night, to ensure a safe sail in elections and build vote banks. This disease went into his head making him a man with short vision confined to nourishing his constituency alone.This selective amnesia disease reached its peak, when he bypassed Employment exchanges and High Court directives, only to appoint his constituency youth in jobs. The answer obtained under Right to Information Act, will reveal all the jobs in the proposed Puducherry Medical College coming up in his constituency had gone only to his constituency people. Ultimately the Himalayan corruption hidden there is under Central Vigilance Commission scanner is another story, thanks to the 5 Ministers revolting against autocracy. Here the lawlessness and the patronage to his criminal connections taking law into their hands further gets entrenched every day while citizens are praying for wisdom to dawn on Center and party high command.


Government of Pondicherry on 22.2.1983 under section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act acquired 50 acres out of 61 acres and 5 cents for free distribution of housing plots. The remaining land not acquired to the extent of 11 acres 50 cents in Survey No 77 / 1B was handed over to Sivashankaran, Pugazh Chozhan and Raji, the owners. The revenue officials in their submission to Court along with acquisition order 4/82 dated 22.02.1983 and court order 53/ 83 dated 22.11.1993, patta, chitta, sketch etc proved that this piece of land is not puramboke, but a private property.


The learned judge cited this and said that at the time of acquisition no hutments were there.  Then in a case LA OP No 53/83 in the First Additional District Judges court on 22nd November 1983, the question of deciding the rightful owner for apportionment of award amount came up. Thiru.A.Gandhiraj, who was Education Minister and senior aspirant to recently chosen PCC President Post, appeared in his capacity as Government Pleader, and on behalf of the Petitioners current AICC General Secretary V.Narayanasamy M.P appeared. The three petitioners Pugazhchozhan, Sivasankaran, Raju got award amount. The fact they proved their rightful ownership and got award, must be taken note of, because the game Rangasamy is going to play in this issue.


Mr.M.J.S.Sundar, a Christian who runs St.Peter’s Middle English School bought the land in R.S.No 77/IB where Rangasamy instigated trespass, grabbing had taken place, and in support of that Rangasamy deposed before Court and told untruth, for which the learned judge took honesty in his stride and unmasked Rangasamy in judgment. Dravida Peravai feels sorry to mention the victim’s religion as Christian, because while Rangasamy seeks caste clout, we felt it necessary to remind that the Party President which keeps this anti social in citadels of power is above petty considerations, for on the basis of religious affinity they had not taken cudgels against Rangasamy, who spreads caste virus in a cosmopolitan culture of Puducherry. In the Court of I Additional District Munsif , Mr.M.J.Sundar in I.A No 3752/ 96 in O.S.No 1454 /96 obtains interim injunction against 22 all of them happen to be women, as shield to grabbers, restraining them from interfering with the property till disposal of suit. In the long legal battle on 30 th November 2002 the learned judge passed the order in which the paragraph at beginning of this letter which mentions about Rangasamy is delivered.


In this episode we have to cut short attempts to file cases where in mid stream parties passed away but their signatures forged, to delay delivery of justice, and we can pass on many such evidences to CBI, if you direct CBI to probe this land grab too. Let us come to the scene : The II ADM Court ordered to physically deliver the property to Mr.M.J.Sundar based upon the order of II Additional District Judge and the Amin of the Court along with Dhanvantrinagar Police, Village Administrative Officer of Thattanchavady entered the property to evict the encroachers and to hand over the property to Mr.M.J.Sundar, a local gangster R.Velayudam, whose name is in rowdy list and who is implicated in many cases C.P Nos 23 /96, 195/93, 31/95, 6/96, 86/96, 25/97, 29/99, Crime No 113/2000, O.C 595/2001 enters the scene, threatens Mr.M.J.Sundar, stating that it was his property and  Sundar had got a wrong judgment in Court.


Meanwhile a stay was obtained in High Court in all the 22 cases. In local courts the same 22 cases is pending. The irony here is in II ADM court Puducherry 22 counters and petitions are filed on 16.6.2003 stating stay in High Court had been obtained. By telling lie the Court order to evict encroachments and hand over property to M.J.Sundar is stalled. Actually High Court grants stay in 22 cases beginning from 23.1.2004 up to March 2004. To delay 6 months to get stay a simple lie that High Court stay is obtained is used, all is possible under Rangasamy regime.


One Mrs.Vijayalakshmi committed suicide on 24.8.2003, her death not informed to local court nor High Court, but a stay in her name was obtained, a mysterious way of ghost signing vakalats, affidavits and getting stay, thereby proving in death also an encroacher gets relief, because some intelligent crook manipulated misleading courts.


Another party Mr.Anbazhagan  whom the Court Amin went to arrest reported in II ADM Court on 17.03.2003 that Anbazhagan was not in station for past 5 years.After that a vakalat, counter and petition etc filed in local and High Court, another surprise in judicial jungle, where signatures vary  thereby indicating foul play.


Another party on 23.4.2003 Angalan shifts family to France but all vakalats, petitions; counters were filed in his name here. Using forged signatures to hoodwink Courts, the original land owner to whom the property should have been handed over is made to run from pillar to posts, in order to justify encroachments made with the blessings of Rangasamy, whose untruth was unmasked in a Court judgment cited in beginning.


“In my constituency private property will be encroached, and in Court I will appear in witness box to defend encroachments”, Rangasamy can boast and even after Court orders to hand over property, will use anti socials to thwart that use influence to get stays in the name of living and dead, or even using ghosts to delay justice to a citizen, is the style of Rangasamy’s Rowdy Raj in Puducherry, historians can write.


The ultimate sinner is the Indian Prime Minister and All India Congress Committee, which is incapable to oust the King of Lust from the Chief Minister’s chair. Hell to citizens, let us make hay when tsunami strikes by allowing Rangasamy to loot public exchequer and make the union territory bankrupt seems to be the guiding principle of the day.


Long Live Democracy!  Let Citizen face the music.


With Regards

Yours sincerely


General Secretary






Mr.Rahul Gandhi M.P                                                                      23rd March 2008

General Secretary All India Congress Committee


Respected Rahul Gandhi


Dravida Peravai, the political party of Periyarites which never seeks office but works for social causes, wishes to place on record our appreciation for your visit to Naxal infected areas Orissa. Instead of brushing naxalism as law and order issue, you have gone there to understand the ground reality as well as to trace the root cause for people turning towards path of violence. By your visit whole India has started to look for your intervention on many issues which the old guard in your party will keep in cold storage.Close on the heels of this trip, Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair showered praise on you saying that you are the “most talented” and “insightful” of the younger generation of politicians worldwide and you have got a first class mind and great commitment to India. This made us think that you can be approached to place our views on the worst Chief Minister of Puducherry who still clings to office shamelessly in spite of many blunders he has been committing unmindful of the existence of high command.


1. No human being with a heart and conscience would have amassed private wealth at the cost of Tsunami victims. Two weeks ago the Joint Action Committee of Puducherry Fishermen Association met our Hon’ble Prime Minister and complained not a single house had been constructed by Puducherry Government and only Maharastra Government and Ngo’s had constructed. Under RTI Act, the PMO states that 1212 crores is unspent in Puducherry. Dravida Peravai had submitted a detailed complaint to the Sub Committee on Tsunami Relief under the Ministry Home Affairs. Yet the old guard in your party does not want to sack him.


2. The Special Component Plan funds that should have been earmarked according to population will technically be spelt in budget but spent for other projects. The Parliamentary party  leader of PMK, Professor Ramdass, an economist of repute had issued press statement that 1277 crores earmarked for Special Component Plan meant for Scheduled Caste Welfare had not reached the SC people, and SC associations are agitating to get back this bag log as Special Package from Centre. Yet your party keeps him in power antagonizing the oppressed classes.


3. The dream of your father Rajiv Gandhi, the Panchayat Raj in Puducherry, a tiny state, could not be realized, that too with your party at the helm here. The Chief of Local Bodies few days ago carried out a protest procession on the refusal of the Chief Minister to hand over adequate powers to local bodies. Close on the heels of this procession, The Minister Mr.Malladi Krishna Rao, had shed his Local Administration portfolio, accusing that last year the allocation for Local bodies were in the tune of 61 crores, but this year it is going to be Rs 44 crore, out of which Rs 33 crores will go to MLA Constituency Development leaving just 10 crores for Local Administration in the proposed budget of Rs 1750 crores to be presented on 26 th March 2008.


4. The AIADMK General Secretary J.Jayalalitha directed her partymen to launch an agitation on 20th March seeking dismissal of Rangasamy Government, because it had made mockery of the Cabinet system and many decisions were taken bypassing the cabinet. This had been our charge in the memorandum submitted to Lt.Governor Mr.Mukut Mithi on 13th March, which was lifted in letter and spirit by AIADMK Supremo.


Subsequently the Supreme Court in a judgment of 4th March had found Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister of constitutional violations and since the judgment in fact fitted in every way with the functioning of N.Rangasamy, we had urged the President, marking copies to all Ministers in Mr.Manmohan Singh Government, to dismiss the Government headed by N.Rangasamy. We are not demanding the dismissal of a Congress Chief Minister for the sake of politics or rivalry like the case of J.Jayalalitha. We only want a human being with fewer vices as our Chief Minister.


5. The 5 Cabinet Ministers are united in fighting to secure their rights under the cabinet system and to ensure all constituencies get equal development chances. Under Rangasamy regime only his constituency youth got jobs bypassing Employment Exchanges, defying High Court orders, floating all rules and regulation, that too 18000 jobs for a constituency of 25,000 voters. Other constituencies got nothing. In last elections, we campaigned all the 6 M.L.A’s of Karaikal enclave failed to fight for Karaikal development under the banner Karaikal Union Territory Struggle group. Yes we are demanding separate Union Territory status for Karaikal in view of total neglect of Karaikal under Rangasamy government. Our appeal resulted in all the 4 Congress M.L.A’s of Karaikal region in the total 6 M.L.A’s lost last elections. Two DMK M.L.A’s scrapped through in 33 votes and less than 200 votes. Fearing that fate will befall on them the 5 Ministers are on warpath. Congress high command, though unmindful to peoples woes could at least have thought of party interests and prospects in future polls .It should have sacked the Chief Minister, who manipulates media by lavish advertisements, who masks his animal instincts under the guise of simple ness, who patronizes criminals.


6. Dravida Peravai wrote to Union Home Secretary, who acted promptly and now criminals are on the run here. The irony is Tamilnadu Police had set up permanent camp here and is searching house to house not only in Chief Minister’s constituency but also in assembly premises, an investigative Tamil weekly report.


7. Chief Minister foisting case against 2 cabinet colleagues so far and one 2 more on Monday 24th  before budget presentation, just to wreak vengeance on 5 cabinet colleagues who wanted threadbare discussion in cabinet, which for first time debated 6 hours and more departing past practice of Chief Minister taking unilateral decisions bypassing cabinet. Congress Chief Minister tarnishing Congress cabinet ministers is permissible under the AICC norms, may be that is Congress way of democracy, people are making sarcastic remarks. Is one man above party?


We hope you have the insight to find out truth and to eliminate the Godfather of Crime from seats of power. As Italian people unable to tolerate the mafia protested in streets and told “Basta Basta”, we are telling in Italian “Basta “of Rangasamy.


With Regards

Yours fraternally


N.Nandhivarman General Secretary Dravida Peravai











Copy to: Hon’ble Sonia Gandhi M.P                                                   24.4.2008

                Hon’ble Rahul Gandhi M.P


Respected Sir


Subject: Cheap Minister N.Rangasamy’s Orchestra against Chief Secretary regarding.


With due regard to the constitutional post of Chief Minister, we are not keen in degrading its respectability hence we chose to complain against a Cheap Minister who had patronized all criminality and corruption in our tiny Union Territory. The corruption in this state grew in Himalayan heights after the Union Government appointed Mr.C.S.Khairwal as Chief Secretary of our cursed territory, cursed by the Union Government.


The Chief Vigilance Commission headed by Noble Man .N.Vittal had released a list of 95 most corrupted officials in this country, wherein the 4th name in list, Mr.C.S.Khairwal who got the honor states “ C.S.Khairwal, Secretary, Tourism Delhi : In February 1996, Khairwal, a 1974 batch IAS officer was arrested on corruption charges and his wealth was estimated at approximately Rs.10 crores. This included Rs.9.7 crores in real estate and the rest in fixed deposits, jewellry, vehicles, besides cash. According to CBI, Khairwal made his millions when bus transports in Delhi were privatized and transport operators, in search of lucrative routes, bribed officials heavily. The CBI believes Khairwal’s fortunes grew in direct proportion to the permit violations by the operators”


This Chief Secretary aided , abetted, assisted, advised Mr.N.Rangasamy on whichever ways by whatever means public money, including tsunami funds could be grabbed by creation of societies which need not be audited by Comptroller and Auditor General. Having been assisted by such a corrupt official who went out of his way to nourish the ego of Mr.N.Rangasamy making him to live under the illusion that he is Maharaja of Independent princely state of Puducherry, N.Rangasamy is unhappy with successive Lt.Governor’s and Chief Secretaries, whether they were NDA or UPA government appointees.Mr.N.Rangasamy crossed swords with Lt.Governor N.N.Jha, and the Union Home Ministry if you seek will provide all files which former Lt.Governor N.N.Jha made complaints against N.Rangasamy. The same is the case recently resigned Lt.Governor Mukut Mithi, a former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesht, who knows the rule and the limits of an elected Chief Minister, who should not bypass cabinet’s authority usurping the powers to nurse his own constituency. The former Chief Secretary Prakash Mehra too faced innumerable hurdles in his tenure, all because none of these authorities be it Lt.Governor or Chief Secretary danced to the tunes of N.Rangasamy.


The current Chief Secretary Mr.Rakesh Bihari had been constantly under the firing line of the Cheap Minister N.Rangasamy. In midst of agitating students, he instigated the students saying the Chief Secretary is the stumbling block for educational fee scheme. Close on the heels of this appearing in media, our party wrote to the Prime Minister and Lt.Governor that the “Chief Minister had violated the oath of secrecy by publicly targeting his Chief Secretary”. Since all of you who respect democracy and our constitution did not remove this autocrat from office and he bought time begging to submit the budget, he has started his orchestra against the Chief Secretary, using the most obedient servant to him, the Opposition Leader A.M.H.Nazim of DMK. The open debate in Legislative assembly against a Chief Secretary and on which complaint he should act, which enquiry to be dropped, and the intervention of Cheap Minister N.Rangasamy advising the Chief Secretary in the floor of the house and through electronic and print media, not to act against complaints, which the gangs call anonymous ones, forgetting the fact that CVC allows whistle blowers to expose corruption. Here the attack is not on anonymous complaints but specific complaints made by the registered political party Dravida Peravai, and other consumer-socio-political organizations. Just for the sake of promised Corporations in post budget session, the Opposition Leader is trying to bark at the honest officials to stall all complaints.


The commercial tax dues not collected by the Government are one issue over which complaints went. There are numerous petrol bunks in Puducherry, where the petrol/diesel prices are kept lower. This had created a petrol/diesel smuggler’s lobby, which do not literally smuggle petrol/ diesel after it reaches Puducherry limits. The quota for Puducherry is offloaded en route to Puducherry in Tamil Nadu itself, and many times more than the intake in Puducherry, the quantum of offloaded petrol in Tamilnadu is more. This smuggling helps the petrol bunks in Puducherry to pocket huge profits, and in Tamilnadu the dealers who benefit out of this smuggling evades sales tax that is due to Tamilnadu by them. The Puducherry Petrol/Diesel bunks too evade sales tax that is due to Puducherry. Thus a smuggling racket depriving both states of their due thrives for long. The irony of the situation here is Dravida Peravai sent complaint to the Chief Secretary about bunks that show sales in Puducherry but had kept huge tax arrears. We cited one incident of 6 cores uncollected from single dealer. Acting on our complaint when Chief Secretary forwards that to Commercial Taxes department under the Cheap Minister, in order to stall such collections that are due to state exchequer, the Cheap Minister engages the lung power of the Opposition Leader and other cheer leaders of the Cheap Minister, to turn the heat on Chief Secretary by open comment and advice through the floor of the House. The industrialists owe 90 crore power bills, is another case in another day Cheap Minister will let loose his cheer leaders, all to stop collections due to government coffers.


His continuance in office every other day is a loss to National Exchequer, and his continuance in office brings shame only to the doors of you as Prime Minister, and Madam Sonia Gandhi who heads a political party  which should set an example to others.


N.Nandhivarman, General Secretary, Dravida Peravai.